-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/#review201750
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/master/master.cpp
Lines 7130 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/#comment283338>

    I'd add a comment here explaining what we are doing.
    
    Maybe something like:
    
    "All tasks from this agent are now reachable. Update framework bookkeeping, 
removing tasks that were dropped en-route to the agent and marked as 
unreachable."



src/tests/partition_tests.cpp
Lines 167-168 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/#comment283324>

    I'd write something like:
    
    ```
    This is a regression test for MESOS-8750. It verifies that a master won't 
crash when a `RunTaskMessage` associated to a partition aware framework is 
dropped en route to the agent and then the agent fails over.
    ```



src/tests/partition_tests.cpp
Lines 169 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/#comment283308>

    s/cleanUpUnreachableTasks/CleanUpUnreachableTasks/



src/tests/partition_tests.cpp
Lines 182 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/#comment283309>

    The indentation here looks off.



src/tests/partition_tests.cpp
Lines 200 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/#comment283312>

    Ditto indentation.



src/tests/partition_tests.cpp
Lines 206-207 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/#comment283313>

    Ditto indentation.



src/tests/partition_tests.cpp
Lines 216 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/#comment283317>

    s/Offer/const Offer&/



src/tests/partition_tests.cpp
Lines 220 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/#comment283320>

    s/Capture/Drop/ ?
    
    Where is the pid unset?
    
    I think I'd write something like: "Drop the `RunTaskMessage`", so that the 
agent doesn't learn about the new task.



src/tests/partition_tests.cpp
Lines 222 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/#comment283318>

    Ditto indentation.



src/tests/partition_tests.cpp
Lines 228 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/#comment283319>

    Remove this blank line.



src/tests/partition_tests.cpp
Lines 235 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/#comment283323>

    Ditto indentation.



src/tests/partition_tests.cpp
Lines 241 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/#comment283325>

    Ditto indentation.



src/tests/partition_tests.cpp
Lines 279-282 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/#comment283326>

    Ditto indentation.



src/tests/partition_tests.cpp
Lines 303 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/#comment283327>

    Ditto indentation.



src/tests/partition_tests.cpp
Lines 317 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/#comment283328>

    Ditto indentation.



src/tests/partition_tests.cpp
Lines 319-323 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/#comment283329>

    Ditto indentation.



src/tests/partition_tests.cpp
Lines 328-332 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/#comment283330>

    Ditto indentation.



src/tests/partition_tests.cpp
Lines 346-350 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/#comment283331>

    Ditto indentation.



src/tests/partition_tests.cpp
Lines 355-359 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/#comment283332>

    Ditto indentation.



src/tests/partition_tests.cpp
Lines 379 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/#comment283336>

    s/reregister/re-register/



src/tests/partition_tests.cpp
Lines 384 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/#comment283333>

    Ditto indentation.



src/tests/partition_tests.cpp
Lines 433-437 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/#comment283334>

    Ditto indentation.



src/tests/partition_tests.cpp
Lines 452-456 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/#comment283335>

    Ditto indentation.


- Gaston Kleiman


On April 23, 2018, 11:11 a.m., Megha Sharma wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 23, 2018, 11:11 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Jiang Yan Xu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: 8750
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/8750
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> A RunTask messsage could get dropped for an agent while it's
> disconnected from the master and when such an agent goes unreachable
> then this dropped task message gets added to the unreachable tasks.
> When the agent re-registers, the master sends status updates for the
> tasks that the agent reported when re-registering and these tasks are
> also removed from the unreachableTasks on the framework but since the
> agent doesn't know about the dropped task so it doesn't get removed
> from the unreachableTasks leading to a check failure when
> this inconsistency is detected during framework removal.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/master.hpp 0d9620dd0c232dc1df83477e838eeb7313bf8828 
>   src/master/master.cpp 767ad8cfe142b47ef07172bcb2a4fb49fc3e833a 
>   src/tests/partition_tests.cpp 9138e5c745cf354a3573e1ab0b251d46702833cc 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66644/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Megha Sharma
> 
>

Reply via email to