> On May 11, 2018, 11:34 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/linux/devices.cpp
> > Lines 73 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/67097/diff/1/?file=2020541#file2020541line74>
> >
> >     I'd suggest we just skip this whitelist entry, instead of fail the 
> > agent launch.
> >     
> >     If the operator does not specify the device path, it indicate that he 
> > does not want the device path to show up in the container. He just want the 
> > device cgroup to allow the device to be whitelisted. Thoughts?

I thought about that, and I'm happy to change to that behaviour. However, even 
in the devices cgroup isolator, the path is actually required .. it just 
silently doesn't work if you omit the path. Maybe we should require the path in 
both cases?


- James


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/67097/#review202975
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 11, 2018, 6:32 p.m., James Peach wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/67097/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 11, 2018, 6:32 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gilbert Song, Jason Lai, Jie Yu, and Zhitao Li.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8792
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8792
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added `linux/devices` isolator support for populating the container
> devices.  This introduces a general mechanism for populating devices
> into a specific container but currently only implements devices for all
> containers based on the devices specified by the `--allowed_devices`
> agent flag.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/linux/devices.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/linux/devices.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/67097/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> manual
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> James Peach
> 
>

Reply via email to