> On June 8, 2018, 3:58 p.m., Andrew Schwartzmeyer wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/io.hpp
> > Lines 29-39 (original), 29-41 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/67391/diff/1/?file=2032289#file2032289line29>
> >
> >     Should we re-use the header guard like this, or add a define to CMake?
> 
> Akash Gupta wrote:
>     What's the difference between the two? I don't know enough about CMake.

IIRC the pattern is usually something like `option(ENABLE_LIBWINIO ...)`, `if 
(ENABLE_LIBWINIO) target_compile_definitions(libprocess PRIVATE 
ENABLE_LIBWINIO)` and then `#ifdef ENABLE_LIBWINIO`, rather than the side 
effect of the header guard getting defined when the files are included. Your 
way works too, and even seems simpler, just wondering if it'll confuse anyone.


> On June 8, 2018, 3:58 p.m., Andrew Schwartzmeyer wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/CMakeLists.txt
> > Lines 86-87 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/67391/diff/1/?file=2032290#file2032290line90>
> >
> >     There shouldn't be headers in CMake source lists... I'm not sure why 
> > the others are in here either...
> 
> Akash Gupta wrote:
>     Are they for the "private" headers? The headers I see here are all in 
> process/src/*.hpp.

I fixed it upstream; when you rebase you can delete these headers from CMake.


- Andrew


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/67391/#review204504
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 30, 2018, 11:42 a.m., Akash Gupta wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/67391/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 30, 2018, 11:42 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Andrew Schwartzmeyer, Benjamin Mahler, Eric Mumau, 
> John Kordich, Joseph Wu, and Radhika Jandhyala.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8668
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8668
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added Windows IOCP backend to the build system. Now, there are two async
> backends, which are libevent through `ENABLE_LIBEVENT` and the Windows
> IOCP (libwinio) through `ENABLE_LIBWINIO`.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/CMakeLists.txt ecb6946401d9b81c6610cf9f33dcf2caa9ff0f04 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/io.hpp 
> cc2caf44e065bed40263f3820e95a4f7c378bb98 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/CMakeLists.txt 
> cf443dffd0663ecf02b7efd6f7094175b94aae19 
>   cmake/CompilationConfigure.cmake 2f92acb3a140faa48e3639c7000be7f43020ad7d 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/67391/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Akash Gupta
> 
>

Reply via email to