----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/67502/#review207241 -----------------------------------------------------------
Fix it, then Ship it! support/python3/common.py Lines 153-154 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/67502/#comment290552> I actually disagree with the TODO here: we often use an empty diff (but a new iteration of the review) to purposefully trigger the Review Bot. - Andrew Schwartzmeyer On Aug. 7, 2018, 10:36 a.m., Dragos Schebesch wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/67502/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 7, 2018, 10:36 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Andrew Schwartzmeyer and Armand Grillet. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Refactored ReviewBoard API functionality into separate module. > > > Diffs > ----- > > support/python3/common.py PRE-CREATION > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/67502/diff/5/ > > > Testing > ------- > > For example, to call the api on a specific review_url, with some data, we > would use the following code: > > ``` > ReviewBoardHandler().api(review_url, data) > ``` > > > Thanks, > > Dragos Schebesch > >
