----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68326/#review207254 -----------------------------------------------------------
3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/gmock.hpp Lines 711 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/68326/#comment290586> Nit: should we be consistent with `FutureMessage` and name the template typenames `From` and `To`? - Gastón Kleiman On Aug. 13, 2018, 3:22 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/68326/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 13, 2018, 3:22 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Gastón Kleiman and Meng Zhu. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > These extend the existing event expectations to handle `ExitedEvent`. > > > Diffs > ----- > > 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/gmock.hpp > e30f5863d3d028fa320ca4b674a6c7a499c15991 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68326/diff/2/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Added a test in a subsequent patch. > > > Thanks, > > Benjamin Mahler > >
