-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68555/#review208205
-----------------------------------------------------------



Patch looks great!

Reviews applied: [68495, 68555]

Passed command: export OS='ubuntu:14.04' BUILDTOOL='autotools' COMPILER='gcc' 
CONFIGURATION='--verbose --disable-libtool-wrappers' ENVIRONMENT='GLOG_v=1 
MESOS_VERBOSE=1'; ./support/docker-build.sh

- Mesos Reviewbot


On Aug. 29, 2018, 7:22 a.m., Qian Zhang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/68555/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 29, 2018, 7:22 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Andrei Budnik, Alexander Rukletsov, Gastón Kleiman, 
> and Gilbert Song.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8568
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8568
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Previously when checker library fails to remove the previous check
> container, it will discard the promise and launch a new check container
> which will cause two problems:
>   1. The discarded promise is used to launch the new check container,
>      that means even the new check container is launched successfully,
>      we still have no chance to process its check result since the
>      promise has already been discarded.
>   2. The previous check container will never get a chance to be removed
>      which is leak, i.e., its runtime directory and sandbox directory
>      will not be removed.
> 
> Now in this patch, when checker library fails to remove the previous
> check container, we make it remove the previous check container again.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/checks/checker_process.cpp 77a76f465fe57eab89f027b5acb74c2339551678 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68555/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> sudo make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Qian Zhang
> 
>

Reply via email to