> On Feb. 13, 2019, 9:28 p.m., Andrei Budnik wrote:
> > Thanks for the patch!
> > I think we should implement a test for this. Otherwise, it would be very 
> > dangerous to _refactor_ this part of code in the future.
> > If you have no chance to implement a test for this now, please feel free to 
> > file a ticket.

Sure, I posted a unit test here: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69994/


- Qian


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/69972/#review212795
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 13, 2019, 4:26 p.m., Qian Zhang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/69972/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 13, 2019, 4:26 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Andrei Budnik and Gilbert Song.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-9507
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9507
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> There are two cases we need to handle:
>   1. The checkpointed docker volumes file does not exist.
>   2. The checkpointed docker volumes file is empty.
> For both of the two cases, in the recovery of `docker/volume` isolator,
> we should remove the container's checkpoint directory and then skip the
> container.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/docker/volume/isolator.cpp 
> a72fc84da6fb0f24d363dd4c635500510da675d8 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69972/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Qian Zhang
> 
>

Reply via email to