----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66746/#review213233 -----------------------------------------------------------
Bad review! Reviews applied: [66746] Error: 2019-02-26 21:33:43 URL:https://reviews.apache.org/r/66746/diff/raw/ [45557/45557] -> "66746.patch" [1] error: patch failed: include/mesos/type_utils.hpp:23 error: include/mesos/type_utils.hpp: patch does not apply error: patch failed: include/mesos/v1/mesos.hpp:23 error: include/mesos/v1/mesos.hpp: patch does not apply error: patch failed: src/common/type_utils.cpp:36 error: src/common/type_utils.cpp: patch does not apply error: patch failed: src/v1/mesos.cpp:35 error: src/v1/mesos.cpp: patch does not apply - Mesos Reviewbot On April 20, 2018, 1:19 p.m., Kapil Arya wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/66746/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated April 20, 2018, 1:19 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler and Till Toenshoff. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > The MessageDifferencer utility has been available since protobuf 3.0.0. > When comparing most repeated fields, we treat them as sets so the order > of elements doesn't matter. In some exceptional cases, we treat them as > list so the order becomes important. Further, fields with default > purposes are considered to be set for comparison purposes. > > > Diffs > ----- > > include/mesos/type_utils.hpp 19ea81716496bcc0117a1b0ff157a0374f38bbfa > include/mesos/v1/mesos.hpp fda3eb42061f820869a2d8da939fccadc4e5ddfb > src/common/type_utils.cpp 33d63809b61a18e03ff745c88f024c71dd221ca2 > src/tests/master_allocator_tests.cpp > e1aef8a9625a805e7ad2dfad37bfeedee82f160d > src/v1/mesos.cpp 9b2df2dd798dff24a91a2604ab53c7fbb5ecfbcf > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66746/diff/1/ > > > Testing > ------- > > `make check` currently fails with: > DefaultExecutorCheckTest.CommandCheckSharesWorkDirWithTask > DefaultExecutorCheckTest.MultipleTasksWithChecks > > > Thanks, > > Kapil Arya > >
