> On March 27, 2019, 5:57 a.m., James DeFelice wrote: > > support/packaging/centos/mesos.spec > > Lines 94 (patched) > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/70295/diff/1/?file=2133927#file2133927line94> > > > > we probably want to conditionally enable this depending on the centos > > version. for example I don't think el6 ships w/ the necessary kernel > > support for launcher-sealing, but I think that el7 does. > > > > see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DistTag
+1 - Gilbert ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/70295/#review214102 ----------------------------------------------------------- On March 25, 2019, 8:09 a.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/70295/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 25, 2019, 8:09 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Gilbert Song, Joseph Wu, and Till Toenshoff. > > > Bugs: MESOS-9677 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9677 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > We enable this flag since with it disabled certain public functions > are not available making it hard to e.g., write modules against this > version of Mesos. > > While launcher sealing depends on a recent kernel, the platform we > build RPMs for already satisfies the requirements. > > > Diffs > ----- > > support/packaging/centos/mesos.spec > de905fda3366be5904a0aec8249abcc53b0af9a0 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/70295/diff/1/ > > > Testing > ------- > > `make check` > > > Thanks, > > Benjamin Bannier > >
