-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/70356/#review214335
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Andrei Budnik


On April 2, 2019, 1:27 a.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/70356/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 2, 2019, 1:27 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Andrei Budnik, Gilbert Song, James Peach, and Qian 
> Zhang.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-9529
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9529
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> If a container shares the same pid namespace as its parent and is not a
> top level container. It might or might not share the same pid namespace
> as the agent. In this case, we need to re-mount `/proc`.
> 
> One caveat here is that: in the case where this container does share the
> pid namespace of the agent (because its parent shares the same pid
> namespace of the agent), mounting `/proc` at the same place will result
> in EBUSY.
> 
> As a result, we need to "move" (MS_MOVE) the mounts under `/proc` to a
> new location and mount the `/proc` again at the old location.
> 
> See MESOS-9529 for details.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/namespaces/pid.cpp 
> 5df31227454c5865ad13c0c334168938c1bc6cad 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/paths.hpp 
> 2dc222e8db2e27a41b5dd1da01095005d76bcd80 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/paths.cpp 
> 94ab921a79ff62bd43b5c72a368ec8b3e37ef110 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/70356/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> sudo make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jie Yu
> 
>

Reply via email to