----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/70795/#review216020 -----------------------------------------------------------
Fix it, then Ship it! Great! Please don't forget to update the review description to match the changed naming. docs/ssl.md Lines 176 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/70795/#comment302972> s/can not/cannot/ docs/ssl.md Lines 194 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/70795/#comment302973> I wonder if we should already start a deprecation of the `libprocess` scheme - that would be: - announcing that `openssl` will be standard soon on compatible boxes - announcing it to be gone at some point Or am I too eager for unification here? - Till Toenshoff On June 20, 2019, 5:27 p.m., Benno Evers wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/70795/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated June 20, 2019, 5:27 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Jan-Philip Gehrcke, Joseph Wu, > and Till Toenshoff. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Added a description of the new `--hostname_validation_algorithm` flag > and corresponding `LIBPROCESS_SSL_HOSTNAME_VALIDATION_ALGORITHM` > environment variable. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/ssl.md ce5058896144aa7824986d40d996899d92cb7c1c > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/70795/diff/3/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Benno Evers > >
