> On June 21, 2019, 1:32 a.m., Till Toenshoff wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/openssl.cpp
> > Lines 808 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/70749/diff/4/?file=2151450#file2151450line808>
> >
> >     I know you just moved it, but where do these 100ms come from and how 
> > could we be more explicit about that choice?
> >     
> >     I would suggest to use a const with some explaining comment how that 
> > value was chosen - can we please? :D
> 
> Benno Evers wrote:
>     I'm afraid I have no idea where the 100ms come from. The suggestion 
> sounds good, but I think the changes will fit better in a separate review, 
> since they're not really related to hostname validation.

Fixed in https://reviews.apache.org/r/70933/


- Benno


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/70749/#review216017
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 21, 2019, 3:32 p.m., Benno Evers wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/70749/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 21, 2019, 3:32 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Joseph Wu, and Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-9809
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9809
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This commit introduces a new libprocess SSL flag
> `hostname_validation_scheme`, which can be used to select
> between the previous hostname validation behaviour and a new
> option to use standardized OpenSSL algorithms to handle
> hostname validation as part of the
> 
> As a nice side-effect, the new scheme gets rid of reverse DNS
> lookups during TLS connection establishment, which used to be
> a common source of hard-to-debug unresponsiveness in Mesos
> components.
> 
> See `docs/ssl.md` in the follow-up commit for details of and
> differences between the schemes.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/ssl/flags.hpp 
> f3483f97f93bb29117b2c78f0f2ed9735d9c4b3a 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/openssl.hpp 
> 17bec246e516261f8d772f1647c17f092fae82d1 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/openssl.cpp 
> e7dbd67913fa8e7fbbf60dee428e7e38895f86ce 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/posix/libevent/libevent_ssl_socket.hpp 
> 6ef5a86566af3439cfe0b06ab3576076623f7be0 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/posix/libevent/libevent_ssl_socket.cpp 
> 29a1bf71c1df9d80370455a6269ecea0ec4193b0 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/70749/diff/5/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Todo!
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benno Evers
> 
>

Reply via email to