-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/70757/#review216461
-----------------------------------------------------------



Bad review!

Reviews applied: [70757]

Error:
2019-07-10 00:27:31 URL:https://reviews.apache.org/r/70757/diff/raw/ 
[12172/12172] -> "70757.patch" [1]
error: patch failed: src/slave/containerizer/mesos/launch.cpp:57
error: src/slave/containerizer/mesos/launch.cpp: patch does not apply
error: src/tests/containerizer/linux_nnp_isolator_tests.cpp: does not exist in 
index

- Mesos Reviewbot


On July 9, 2019, 6:15 p.m., Jacob Janco wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/70757/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 9, 2019, 6:15 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Andrei Budnik, Gilbert Song, Jie Yu, and James 
> Peach.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-9770
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9770
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch adds the isolation capability of flipping the
> NO_NEW_PRIVILEGES bit for process control.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/slave/containerizer.proto 
> 2d04f3c182a4274dda527a3da56c894c3c892a12 
>   src/CMakeLists.txt 1d4f541b73c07a307a8b61f217e0cfad5dc095e4 
>   src/Makefile.am 761dde1d63e0f4f1ac4ab86f129f84f3746d3153 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp 
> 043244841a73fa3f5f7119bc38f6d3a04be8990b 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/linux/nnp.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/linux/nnp.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/launch.cpp 
> b29ec556399a40aa662987a11a2b64e6a16de889 
>   src/tests/CMakeLists.txt 3ea8b4400ff3b00470aa147cb8f39f62802727e3 
>   src/tests/containerizer/linux_nnp_isolator_tests.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/70757/diff/6/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jacob Janco
> 
>

Reply via email to