-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71519/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for mesos, Benno Evers and Benjamin Mahler.


Bugs: MESOS-9948
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9948


Repository: mesos


Description
-------

This patch fixes some inefficient access patterns around `hashmap::get`.
Since this function returns an `Option` it can be used as a shorthand
for a `contains` check and subsequent creation of a value (`Option`
always contains a value). It was never not intended and is inefficient
for `contains` itself (e.g., via `hashmap::get::isSome`), and for cases
where only access to parts of the value in the `hashmap` is required
(e.g., to read a member of an optional value). In both these cases we
neither want nor need to create a temporary, and should instead either
just use `contains`, or access the value with `hashmap::at` after a
`contains` check since otherwise we might spend a lot of time creating
unnecessary temporary values.

This patch fixes some easily identifiable case found by manually
grooming the result of the following clang-query command:

    match cxxMemberCallExpr(
      on(hasType(cxxRecordDecl(hasName("hashmap")))),
      unless(
        hasParent(cxxBindTemporaryExpr(
          hasParent(materializeTemporaryExpr(
            hasParent(exprWithCleanups(
              hasParent(varDecl())))))))),
      callee(cxxMethodDecl(hasName("get"))))

This most probably misses a lot of cases. Given how easy it is to
misuse `hashmap::get` we should consider whether it makes sense to get
rid of it completely in lie of an inlined form trading some additional
lookups for temporary avoidance,

    Option<X> x = map.contains(k) ? Some(map.at(k)) : Option<X>::none();


Diffs
-----

  src/exec/exec.cpp 67e082e709ef803f49646da5c36147158330f725 
  src/executor/executor.cpp 664a2f1e0723f1afd9220e86e47e86cda67f6b9a 
  src/files/files.cpp f200d5e797084a2a5137ac8f8ede1f6243f12cfb 
  src/master/master.cpp a2c289a8b6e30eac690f77c7fc1b12b16f62f541 
  src/master/metrics.cpp 20d7231888e263cb3c1759407a2476291e515d4a 
  src/slave/containerizer/fetcher.cpp 8ae789a9f260645e574bbe46a108c3b8cab44cc4 
  src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/posix.hpp 
1ff942cfd1f6829bdc3661b9260dd8e53732d023 
  src/slave/containerizer/mesos/launcher.cpp 
413cc621ad49150a6ddaf689bb75b9dc44741563 
  src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/provisioner.cpp 
bf3908d274f8b6f4a57998cbb0a62312b71e3856 
  src/slave/slave.cpp 96890d37ec024fc33d2403b32576776888bcd9f7 
  src/state/log.cpp d3bf2ccceff1934785889ddc9507a754cce445fe 
  src/tests/slave_recovery_tests.cpp d99752ab082f1aca9fb77659378d0bca5a0598eb 
  src/tests/task_status_update_manager_tests.cpp 
0c8b0586a760683ff0ab0f11bf658073087eac12 


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71519/diff/1/


Testing
-------

`make check`


Thanks,

Benjamin Bannier

Reply via email to