-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/72019/#review219313
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/master/master.hpp
Lines 1388-1392 (original), 1395-1399 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/72019/#comment307465>

    Remove this TODO and make these private. Turns out they need to remain 
members to get private access to the master's private members.


- Benjamin Mahler


On Jan. 16, 2020, 10:22 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/72019/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 16, 2020, 10:22 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Andrei Sekretenko and Greg Mann.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-9497
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9497
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This call is not entirely read-only, unlike the other GET_* v1 master
> calls, and therefore it warranted its own patch.
> 
> The approach used is to have a mutex protected list of new subscribers
> that gets written to during the parallel serving. Afterwards, once
> things are serial again on the Master, we add the new subscribers to
> the masters data structures.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/common/http.hpp 47a4d6a1ad4897155448a6ba64e789b15a78c7a2 
>   src/master/http.cpp 8a588635e688eb52cd7b8320426dc412e7b44e18 
>   src/master/master.hpp 3074918d677430b588c7765f5ed82f4e324eeff4 
>   src/master/readonly_handler.cpp fbe748d99c2520b520f56afa50dc0b9bd809778d 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72019/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Mahler
> 
>

Reply via email to