> On March 15, 2020, 9:04 a.m., Qian Zhang wrote:
> > src/master/validation.cpp
> > Lines 1574-1577 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/72216/diff/4/?file=2213417#file2213417line1574>
> >
> >     Why do we want to return error if `taskCpus` is none? The purpose of 
> > this `validateResourceLimits()` method should be validating resource limits 
> > rather than resource requests.

This resource request validation is related to the limits: we don't support 
tasks which specify a resource limit without an associated resource request. I 
updated the patch to return a separate error message for that case. In the 
design doc, we list "best effort" tasks as a non-goal; IMO, a best effort task 
would correspond to a task with a resource limit and no resource request, so I 
don't think we intend to support that case.


> On March 15, 2020, 9:04 a.m., Qian Zhang wrote:
> > src/master/validation.cpp
> > Lines 1832-1838 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/72216/diff/4/?file=2213417#file2213417line1832>
> >
> >     The new method `validateResourceLimits` that you introduced has already 
> > done this validation and that method will be called for both the tasks 
> > launched via `LAUNCH` operation and the tasks launched via `LAUNCH_GROUP` 
> > operation, so I think we do not need to do this validation again here.

I removed that block from `validateResourceLimits()` after reading your comment 
on that section, so I'm going to leave this here to catch this case for task 
groups.


- Greg


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/72216/#review219933
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 11, 2020, 7:10 p.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/72216/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 11, 2020, 7:10 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Andrei Budnik and Qian Zhang.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-10045
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-10045
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added master validation for task resource limits and shared cgroups.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/validation.cpp 084f281eadd65cb8ae0a19b7b7797dc71ccebdd2 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72216/diff/4/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Greg Mann
> 
>

Reply via email to