----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72661/#review221241 -----------------------------------------------------------
include/mesos/mesos.proto Line 1106 (original), 1106 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/72661/#comment310088> I'm not sure that we should mark this as deprecated, since it's still useful for the LVM driver? include/mesos/mesos.proto Lines 1126-1129 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/72661/#comment310090> Should we define this next to `CSIPluginContainerInfo` for consistency? Also, can we move the `Service` message up to the top level of the namespace without breaking the API? Would be nice for `Service` to sit higher now that it's used by two messages; but the name might be too generic for the top level... - Greg Mann On July 16, 2020, 1:47 a.m., Qian Zhang wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/72661/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 16, 2020, 1:47 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Andrei Budnik and Greg Mann. > > > Bugs: MESOS-10148 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-10148 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Updated `CSIPluginInfo` for supporting 3rd party CSI plugins. > > > Diffs > ----- > > include/mesos/mesos.proto 5f795f5dbebc5d79791a011a47d21859ac6cb129 > include/mesos/v1/mesos.proto 07d2f4012551fbb941f5b3caad6caecbafbccfb5 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/72661/diff/5/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Qian Zhang > >
