chenyulin0719 commented on PR #858: URL: https://github.com/apache/yunikorn-k8shim/pull/858#issuecomment-2182756142
@mean-world Sorry I wasn't aware that there is a similar function in shim's utils. For me, I would vote to align the implementation of WaitForCondition(), but keep two separate function in shim and core. I don't think code reuse is necessary here. @pbacsko, @chia7712 WDYT? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
