wilfred-s commented on PR #890: URL: https://github.com/apache/yunikorn-k8shim/pull/890#issuecomment-2290715512
correct, we need to have the option to reject the allocation by the k8shim this late in the cycle. We need to check what is needed for that first. Currently we fail the task. That should not happen, but it is only one part on the k8shim side. We might need to revert things in the caches etc. We also need re-trigger the scheduling in the core. The allocation is already “done” so we need to revert that. With Craig’s changes from [YUNIKORN-2460](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YUNIKORN-2460) in place we might be able to do that as an allocation update from the k8shim to the core which removes the node. Not, sure that would need to be investigated and properly planned -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
