pjfanning commented on PR #30: URL: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin-site/pull/30#issuecomment-3126558636
> I think the direction matches the consensus in https://lists.apache.org/thread/167846z7rrjdjwz9vcxoxpnzqx0pok45 . > > I think 'recommends' still leaves a bit too much to interpretation: do we promise isolation or don't we? Perhaps something like: "This isolation can provide an operational benefit on large deployments, but is not intended as a security boundary: access to your Zeppelin instances should be restricted regardless of how they are deployed."? change made -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@zeppelin.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
