celinayk commented on code in PR #5063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/5063#discussion_r2321758445


##########
zeppelin-zengine/src/main/java/org/apache/zeppelin/interpreter/InterpreterInfoSaving.java:
##########
@@ -62,9 +62,10 @@ public static InterpreterInfoSaving loadFromFile(Path file) 
throws IOException {
 
       if (infoSaving != null && infoSaving.interpreterSettings != null) {
         for (InterpreterSetting interpreterSetting : 
infoSaving.interpreterSettings.values()) {
-          interpreterSetting.convertPermissionsFromUsersToOwners(
-                  jsonObject.getAsJsonObject("interpreterSettings")
-                          .getAsJsonObject(interpreterSetting.getId()));
+          JsonObject interpreterSettingJson = 
jsonObject.getAsJsonObject("interpreterSettings")

Review Comment:
   > Are you sure this is what is meant by “ugly” here? I think we should use 
GSON here to create objects directly.
   > 
   > ```
   > GSON.fromJson(json, myFanceClass.class);
   > ```
   
   Thank you for the feedback! You're absolutely right. I've refactored the 
code to use GSON.fromJson() directly
     instead of JsonObject parameter.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@zeppelin.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to