A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 9872

        Title:      Recommendations for Discovering IPv6 Prefix 
                    Used for IPv6 Address Synthesis 
        Author:     N. Buraglio,
                    T. Jensen,
                    J. Linkova
        Status:     Informational
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       September 2025
        Mailbox:    [email protected],
                    [email protected],
                    [email protected]
        Pages:      10
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-v6ops-prefer8781-07.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9872

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC9872

On networks providing IPv4-IPv6 translation (RFC 7915), hosts and
other endpoints need to know the IPv6 prefix(es) used for translation
(the NAT64 prefix (RFC 6052)). This document provides guidelines for
NAT64 prefix discovery, specifically recommending obtaining the NAT64
prefix from the Router Advertisement option (RFC 8781) when
available.

This document is a product of the IPv6 Operations Working Group of the IETF.


INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to [email protected].  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
http://www.rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to