A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 9947

        Title:      Application of the Alternate-Marking Method 
                    to the Segment Routing Header 
        Author:     G. Fioccola,
                    T. Zhou,
                    G. Mishra,
                    X. Wang,
                    G. Zhang,
                    M. Cociglio
        Status:     Experimental
        Stream:     Independent
        Date:       March 2026
        Mailbox:    [email protected],
                    [email protected],
                    [email protected],
                    [email protected],
                    [email protected],
                    [email protected]
        Pages:      14
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-fz-spring-srv6-alt-mark-17.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9947

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC9947

This document describes an alternative experimental approach for the
application of the Alternate-Marking Method to Segment Routing for
IPv6 (SRv6). It uses an experimental TLV in the Segment Routing
Header (SRH); thus, participation in this experiment should be
between coordinating parties in a controlled domain. This approach
has potential scaling and simplification benefits over the technique
described in RFC 9343, and the scope of the experiment is to
determine whether those are significant and attractive to the
community.

This protocol extension has been developed outside the IETF as an
alternative to the IETF's Standards Track specification RFC 9343 and
it does not have IETF consensus. It is published here to guide
experimental implementation and ensure interoperability among
implementations to better determine the value of this approach. 
Researchers are invited to submit their evaluations of this work to
the Independent Submissions Editor or to the IETF SPRING Working
Group as Internet-Drafts.


EXPERIMENTAL: This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the
Internet community.  It does not specify an Internet standard of any
kind. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to [email protected].  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team

_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
http://www.rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to