On 02-Dec-24 08:26, Salz, Rich wrote:
Today external specifications should be in the Independent series not subjct
to IETF consensus, and I think that has removed the ambiguity for anyone
who reads the boilerplate. If people don't read the boilerplate, that
isn't our problem.
Why has saag has been discussing it
Because sometimes there isn't a formal specification, RFC 9106 for example.
But I'm not seeing anything new here; this has been the situation for as long as
I can remember. RFC 4357 from 2006 for example, which is in the downref
registry.
Because CFRG has published many algorithms, some they invented, some not. See
https://datatracker.ietf.org/rg/cfrg/documents/
I see, but as far as the IETF standards track goess, IRTF Informationals have
the
same status as Independent Stream Informationals (or Experimentals for that
matter).
I still don't see what's new here.
Brian
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list -- rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rfc-interest-le...@rfc-editor.org
