On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 14:56 +0100, Howard Johnson wrote: > On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 08:37 -0500, inode0 wrote: > > On 9/13/06, Jeff Needle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > However, running rhn_register results in an "Invalid architecture" > > > > error. The system is registered with RHN, but has no channel > > > > subscriptions. > > > > > > Can you post the exact error message? It should just work, but I suspect > > > there might be some kinks still to be worked out with the channels. > > > > I opened a ticket about this a couple of days ago. I see the following: > > > > Unsupported release-architecture combination (4.91Client, i686-redhat-linux) > > > > when I register the system with RHN. I can look for more specific > > errors later today if that one doesn't provide the necessary clue. > > That's basically what I'm seeing too. Screenshot at > http://spod.org/~howardj/rhn_reg_error.png > > Logging into my RHN account, I see the machine in my systems list, but > it has a base channel of "(none)".
That's what I see too, and when I navigate through the "Alter Channel Subscriptions" link, I'm not allowed to change the base channel. From the channels list, it seems that the channels for both RHEL 5 beta 1's (server and client) are available (at the bottom of the list). Based on the release lit, it seems like there should be five (5) channels available - VT, Cluster, Server, Desktop, and Workstation. I've just opened bug 206287 for this purpose. Thanks, Mike _______________________________________________ rhelv5-beta-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-beta-list
