Grant Williamson wrote: > Yep got it to work using 1.4.2fc3, compiles fine.
Yes, and it even works - on i686. But has anyone else tried on amd64 yet? I posted the problems I'm having on that platform to openafs-info today. > Jack Neely wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 12:56:26PM +0200, Grant Williamson wrote: > > > >> Perhaps I have been running rhel4 to long, but has UTS_RELEASE been > >> removed. > >> > >> i.e. > >> cat /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/include/linux/version.h > >> returns > >> #define LINUX_VERSION_CODE 132625 > >> #define KERNEL_VERSION(a,b,c) (((a) << 16) + ((b) << 8) + (c)) > >> > >> This causes issues build certain programs i.e. openafs. > >> > >> Is this a bug in beta1 or working as designed. > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> rhelv5-beta-list mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-beta-list > >> > > > > I know the OpenAFS folks are aware of this one. Although you need to > > use a fairly new version of OpenAFS for things to be happy. What > > version are you using? > > > > Jack > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > rhelv5-beta-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-beta-list > > > End of rhelv5-beta-list Digest, Vol 2, Issue 21 > *********************************************** > -- Stephan Wiesand DESY - DV - Platanenallee 6 15738 Zeuthen, Germany _______________________________________________ rhelv5-beta-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-beta-list
