On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 14:32 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 07:23:51PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > is it just me imagining things, or is the RHEL5 HZ value going to be a > > regression for userspace; the current rhel5 kernel behavior is that if > > userspace asks for a 1ms delay, it gets like a 7ms delay. In RHEL4, the > > max delay was 2ms... > > actually, a bit worse it seems.
one thing to note is that this app needs decent timekeeping like an hpet or a box where rdtsc actually works ;) otherwise you only get garbage timings (time is then less accurate than the test itself) _______________________________________________ rhelv5-beta-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-beta-list
