Grant Williamson wrote:
Tim, I understand the reasoning behind it, but for an organization
deploying/maintaining rhel5 its a dammed pain.
Why can redhat not simply go back to a kernel-unsupported package, it
was so much easier.
I really liked the kernel-unsupported package. It provided a great
service in that if it worked for you, great, otherwise, well, sorry.
Problem was..... some bigshot customers ended up using some stuff from
-unsupported... which had a problem. Then we reminded that it was
"unsupported"... to which they replied "we don't care.. YOU shipped it,
YOU fix it". From that point forward -unsupported became a liability
that we couldn't responsibly support. Kinda sad, that we were
completely well intentioned, but the rules can get in the way.
_______________________________________________
rhelv5-beta-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-beta-list
