On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 17:49 -0600, Stanley, Jon wrote: > Nope, you should clone the bug - the developers on Fedora are different > than the RHEL developers (and product management is involved in RHEL > bugs as well).
That's a bit of an overstatement. There are a few projects (kernel
being the most prominent) which have separate maintainers between RHEL
and Fedora. Mostly the reason for the need of two separate bugs is to
keep things straight. Think about the case where you have a single bug
covering both FC and RHEL. The FC bug gets fixed so the bug is
resolved. Now there's much confusion about whether the issue is also
resolved for RHEL.
All that having been said, we do need to make things a little more
streamlined for cloning bugs between releases, and those changes are
coming.
- jkt
--
--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*
Jay Turner, QE Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat,
Inc.
If A equals success, then the formula is: A = X + Y + Z,
X is work. Y is play. Z is keep your mouth shut. - Albert Einstein
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ rhelv5-beta-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-beta-list
