hello, what dose the parameter "-g" with "ntpd" command mean? It describes on manpage as flowings: "ntpd exits if the offset exceeds the sanity limit,which is 1000 s by default" I don't know how to use it.
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <rhelv5-beta-list@redhat.com> Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 1:00 AM Subject: rhelv5-beta-list Digest, Vol 7, Issue 2 > Send rhelv5-beta-list mailing list submissions to > rhelv5-beta-list@redhat.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-beta-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of rhelv5-beta-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. (no subject) (zhangxiliang) > 2. RE: (no subject) (Tom Molesworth) > 3. RE: beta 3 (Vanco, Don) > 4. OK so where's KDE (FD7T1) ? (Terry Polzin) > 5. RE: beta 3 (Pete Waterman) > 6. RE: OK so where's KDE (FD7T1) ? ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > 7. Re: OK so where's KDE (FD7T1) ? (Terry Polzin) > 8. Re: beta 3 (Jason Edgecombe) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:36:53 +0800 > From: "zhangxiliang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [rhelv5-beta-list] (no subject) > To: <rhelv5-beta-list@redhat.com> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > When i start the ntp service successful on server, the client must ntpdate > with the server after waiting a moment. > The moment may be 3~5 minutes, or it may be 10~15 minutes. I don't know > why > it happens? > > Regards > Zhang Xiliang > -------------------------------------------------- > Zhang Xiliang > Development Dept.I > Nanjing Fujitsu Nanda Software Tech. Co., Ltd.(FNST) > 8/F., Civil Defense Building, No.189 Guangzhou Road, > Nanjing, 210029, China > TEL: +86+25-86630566-851 > COINS: 79955-851 > FAX: +86+25-83317685 > MAIL:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 10:07:43 -0000 > From: "Tom Molesworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [rhelv5-beta-list] (no subject) > To: "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (Tikanga) Beta releases discussion > mailing-list" <rhelv5-beta-list@redhat.com> > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Have you tried the iburst parameter in /etc/ntp.conf: > > server 0.fedora.pool.ntp.org iburst > > This should trigger an immediate check, and means that you don't need > ntpdate. > > -----Original Message----- > From: zhangxiliang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 02 February 2007 08:37 > To: rhelv5-beta-list@redhat.com > Subject: [rhelv5-beta-list] (no subject) > > > When i start the ntp service successful on server, the client must > ntpdate > with the server after waiting a moment. > The moment may be 3~5 minutes, or it may be 10~15 minutes. I don't know > why > it happens? > > Regards > Zhang Xiliang > -------------------------------------------------- > Zhang Xiliang > Development Dept.I > Nanjing Fujitsu Nanda Software Tech. Co., Ltd.(FNST) > 8/F., Civil Defense Building, No.189 Guangzhou Road, > Nanjing, 210029, China > TEL: +86+25-86630566-851 > COINS: 79955-851 > FAX: +86+25-83317685 > MAIL:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > _______________________________________________ > rhelv5-beta-list mailing list > rhelv5-beta-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-beta-list > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 09:32:12 -0500 > From: "Vanco, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [rhelv5-beta-list] beta 3 > To: "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 \(Tikanga\) Beta releases discussion > mailing-list" <rhelv5-beta-list@redhat.com> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> We're now inbetween the beta 2 release (Nov 17) and the >> announced relase date (Feb 28) for RHEL 5. I'm assuming there >> will be a beta 3 (but could be wrong). I've also seen the note >> about RC1 in the bugzilla options. >> >> I know the responses to expect, but I have to ask: >> >> Will there be a RHEL 5 beta 3, and when will we see it? (or >> perhaps we'll see it as just some massive download to yum update?) >> >> Thanks, >> Mike > > Bump > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 09:58:07 -0500 > From: Terry Polzin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [rhelv5-beta-list] OK so where's KDE (FD7T1) ? > To: "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (Tikanga) Beta releases discussion > mailing-list" <rhelv5-beta-list@redhat.com> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Not everyone cares for Gnome, yum install kde yields nothing to install > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 189 bytes > Desc: not available > Url : > https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-beta-list/attachments/20070202/f9faaac6/attachment.bin > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 10:06:28 -0500 > From: "Pete Waterman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [rhelv5-beta-list] beta 3 > To: "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 \(Tikanga\) Beta releases discussion > mailing-list" <rhelv5-beta-list@redhat.com> > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Based on the conversations I've had with our RedHat rep's, RH5 is about > to go into a limited RC phase. No beta3. I think I also read somewhere > that they've gone into feature lock and are just doing bugfixes now, > though I can't remember where I saw that so it may not be true. > > Unless one of the preferred vendors throws up a flag with the release > candidate, we should see the final version in March/April. > > -Pete > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vanco, Don > Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 9:32 AM > To: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (Tikanga) Beta releases discussion > mailing-list > Subject: RE: [rhelv5-beta-list] beta 3 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> We're now inbetween the beta 2 release (Nov 17) and the announced >> relase date (Feb 28) for RHEL 5. I'm assuming there will be a beta 3 >> (but could be wrong). I've also seen the note about RC1 in the >> bugzilla options. >> >> I know the responses to expect, but I have to ask: >> >> Will there be a RHEL 5 beta 3, and when will we see it? (or perhaps >> we'll see it as just some massive download to yum update?) >> >> Thanks, >> Mike > > Bump > > _______________________________________________ > rhelv5-beta-list mailing list > rhelv5-beta-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-beta-list > > > > > > This e-mail is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the > recipient(s) named above. > It may include Blackboard confidential and proprietary information, and is > not for redistribution. > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 10:07:19 -0500 > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [rhelv5-beta-list] OK so where's KDE (FD7T1) ? > To: <rhelv5-beta-list@redhat.com> > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hmm... It looks like your looking for the Fedora 7 Test 1 forums... Not > the RHEL5 mailing list... > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry Polzin > Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 9:58 AM > To: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (Tikanga) Beta releases discussion > mailing-list > Subject: [rhelv5-beta-list] OK so where's KDE (FD7T1) ? > > Not everyone cares for Gnome, yum install kde yields nothing to install > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 10:12:38 -0500 > From: Terry Polzin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [rhelv5-beta-list] OK so where's KDE (FD7T1) ? > To: "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (Tikanga) Beta releases discussion > mailing-list" <rhelv5-beta-list@redhat.com> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Friday 02 February 2007 10:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Hmm... It looks like your looking for the Fedora 7 Test 1 forums... Not >> the RHEL5 mailing list... > yeah, wrong list my bad > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 189 bytes > Desc: not available > Url : > https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-beta-list/attachments/20070202/8941661f/attachment.bin > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 11:36:41 -0500 > From: Jason Edgecombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [rhelv5-beta-list] beta 3 > To: "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (Tikanga) Beta releases discussion > mailing-list" <rhelv5-beta-list@redhat.com> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Will openoffice2 be in it? > > Jason > > Pete Waterman wrote: >> Based on the conversations I've had with our RedHat rep's, RH5 is about >> to go into a limited RC phase. No beta3. I think I also read somewhere >> that they've gone into feature lock and are just doing bugfixes now, >> though I can't remember where I saw that so it may not be true. >> >> Unless one of the preferred vendors throws up a flag with the release >> candidate, we should see the final version in March/April. >> >> -Pete >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vanco, Don >> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 9:32 AM >> To: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (Tikanga) Beta releases discussion >> mailing-list >> Subject: RE: [rhelv5-beta-list] beta 3 >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> We're now inbetween the beta 2 release (Nov 17) and the announced >>> relase date (Feb 28) for RHEL 5. I'm assuming there will be a beta 3 >>> (but could be wrong). I've also seen the note about RC1 in the >>> bugzilla options. >>> >>> I know the responses to expect, but I have to ask: >>> >>> Will there be a RHEL 5 beta 3, and when will we see it? (or perhaps >>> we'll see it as just some massive download to yum update?) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Mike >>> >> >> Bump >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rhelv5-beta-list mailing list >> rhelv5-beta-list@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-beta-list >> >> >> >> >> >> This e-mail is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the >> recipient(s) named above. >> It may include Blackboard confidential and proprietary information, and >> is not for redistribution. >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rhelv5-beta-list mailing list >> rhelv5-beta-list@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-beta-list >> >> > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > rhelv5-beta-list mailing list > rhelv5-beta-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-beta-list > > > End of rhelv5-beta-list Digest, Vol 7, Issue 2 > ********************************************** > _______________________________________________ rhelv5-beta-list mailing list rhelv5-beta-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-beta-list
