John,
well I agree arh5k is far from ready, however as a frustrated madwifi end user, I welcome this new driver, which already (to me atleast) shows great promise.

John Summerfield wrote:
Grant Williamson wrote:
Hi,
are there any plans to add ath5k to the el5.2 kernel. I have been playing with the daily builds on FC8 and even though the code is not yet ready, it appears to be more stable than the madwifi driver.

That hasn't been my impression; as one who has several systems running madwifi I'd welcome something built in, if it worked.



_______________________________________________
rhelv5-beta-list mailing list
rhelv5-beta-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-beta-list

Reply via email to