Ahmed Kamal wrote: > This is an apparent bug?! As those "random" ports should not be < 1024? > only high numbered ports should be random? or the rpc based services > should be confined in some range. IMO if this is causing services to > fail to start, it is a serious bug! >
A bug "by design". I've seen it in other various Un*x too. A real PITA. workaround: ensure that daemons which require fixed port numbers will start first. (cupsd before statd) --Keith _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
