I see you mentioned a 8TB filesystem limit, and the 2TB partition limit. Why not just use x86_64 and GPT to avoid all this?
On 11/23/07, Matthias Saou < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm pretty sure this might be of interest on this list. > > My initial questions : > > http://lists.us.dell.com/pipermail/linux-poweredge/2007-November/033616.html > > The setup I've decided to use : > > http://lists.us.dell.com/pipermail/linux-poweredge/2007-November/033744.html > > I think this is pretty much the best performance/size/redundancy/price > you can get for a big file server. It's fully redundant, uses that > redundancy to balance the load, and should be able to scale amazingly > well since glusterfs would easily allow to add nodes to increase > performance or migrate client access to concatenated nodes to increase > storage size. > > Note that I haven't tested this in production yet, so comments and > suggestions are more than welcome. > > Matthias > > -- > Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ > Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) - Linux kernel 2.6.23.1-49.fc8 > Load : 0.20 0.31 0.30 > > _______________________________________________ > rhelv5-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list >
_______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
