On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 17:30 +0100, Jos Vos wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:27:21PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > > > Yeah, in theory. But the reality is that we "only ever" (those famous > > words) have modules in that location. I think I'll add that test though, > > because when that stops being true sometime, it'd be nice not to break. > > But now directories are printed too, so I was wondering how weak-modules > reacts on directories on stdin.
Yeah, that's ok. It'll only deal with actual modules. > > I agree that some solution for firmware is good, though I'm not yet sure > > what we should do. Is it failing to build for you, or are you just > > saying that the /lib/firmware directory doesn't exist on a target? > > The RPM build fails because %files includes /lib/firmware which isn't > present. Ah yeah, but I generally assume that directory will be in the module source. I get the point though, ok so maybe a flag is useful :) Jon. _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
