On 4/10/08, Marc Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> As the machine is not very loaded, it's not really a problem. But I'm > >> wondering what will happen when load rises. > >> > >> Should I worry about weirdness ? Is it possible to alter the way the > >> scheduler work ? > > > > What problem are you trying to solve? > > Some users complained about poor performance the other day. I'm not sure > if the nfs server is to blame or if it may be that only one CPU is beeing > used even under load. > > I will follow Jarod's advice and run ab on the server to see if under load > the kernel uses alle the CPUs. I'll let you know. Anyway, thanks for the > advices ! > > > Energy-wise it's better to have one slightly loaded core and the rest > > idling instead of all cores doing minimal work. > > That, I didn't think of and is an interesting point to keep in mind !
It is probably worth also trying with worker MPM and see what difference you notice. I'm curious to see how that will use all the cores, in my experience I was actually disappointed with it, all I noticed is more ram used.
_______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
