On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 15:06 +0100, solarflow99 wrote: > I am curious if there is a generally accepted convention for exported > shares. For instance say you had both NFS and samba shares, would you > put the files under /exports/share1.. and /samba/share1.., > or /exports/nfs/share1.., and /exports/samba/share1.. ?
I usually put mine under /data/, but as far as I am aware, there is no convention. The data on our servers is wherever it normally is for that type of data - i.e. the generally accepted /export/home for home directories, /var/www/html/ for web pages etc. We then export those things by Samba/NFS/Whatever. We don't choose our mount locations by what protocol they are shared by, because that precludes sharing something via two protocols. Sometimes we have semi-conventions to make it obvious where things are coming *from* (local disk partitions as /local/data whereas SAN presentations are /san/data, NFS as /nfs/data) but never mount things based on how they will be shared. -- Sam _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
