On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 09:23:26AM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > Interesting. Well, unfortunately I can no longer reproduce this. We > upgraded our satellite server last night to 5.0.2 and I've sync'd it > twice since then, so perhaps the metadata got refreshed or kicked > somehow so it's now correct. > > In any case, yum this morning on the same machine isn't complaining and > did the update correctly.
Ah, thanks for the info. We are running 5.0.1 here, it is good to know this may be as easy as updating to 5.0.2. Justin _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
