> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:rhelv5-list-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Jay Turner
> Sent: 30 January 2009 11:19
> To: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (Tikanga) discussion mailing-list
> Subject: RE: [rhelv5-list] RE: satellite/spacewalk server
> 
> On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 08:59 +0000, Nick Lunt wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > Thanks CC, Im gonna setup a virtual Centos5 box and just install RHN
> > Proxy on it and see if it serves our needs. RH Satellite is too
> > expensive so hopefully RHN Proxy will be enough.
> 
> What issue(s) are you trying to address with the RHN Proxy
> installation?
> 
> - jkt

Hi jkt

we have clients distributed all over the UK running RHAS2.1 to RHAS5.2.
Keeping these servers up to date is becoming a nightmare as not all
servers have internet access.
I want a server at our office that our clients can use to update from.

I am going to test it out first on CentOS with some test CentOS clients
and if it works satisfactorily I'll see if I can get the boss to pay for
RHN Proxy.

Cheers,
Nick.

_______________________________________________
rhelv5-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list

Reply via email to