Hi,

I'm really surprised to have absolutely zero feedback about this issue.
Seems like no one has even had a look at the python script I've
provided. I fear that others might be affected by this without knowing
it...

The bug report is here :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489541

If anyone feels like doing either of these, I'd be really grateful :
 * Try to find something wrong in the python script I used for testing.
 * Run the script on servers with relatively high network traffic and
   post the results.

Matthias

Matthias Saou wrote :

> Hi,
> 
> I already reported this problem here a while back : On many RHEL5
> servers, we are seeing bogus bandwidth values being graphed through
> snmp. Basically, we sometimes see 2Gbps peaks on Gigabit interfaces...
> the curves themselves look good, but the values are way too high.
> 
> The same bandwidth usage graphed directly from the switches to which the
> servers are attached is fine (confirmed on various Dell, Cisco and Force
> 10 equipments).
> 
> What puzzled me at first is that looking at the bandwidth usage in real
> time using "iptraf" reports what seems to be correct values. It seems
> like it's the /proc values which are wrong (and ifconfig and snmp use
> those).
> 
> Attached is a simple python script which displays in real time the
> network usage reported by using tcpdump (the iptraf way) and /proc (the
> snmp way).
> 
> On my (not busy at all) workstation (Fedora 10 x86_64), I currently see
> this :
> TCPDUMP: 2533105 (23445 packets)
> PROC:    2507066
> 
> But on a busy web server, RHEL x86_64 5.3 domU, I see :
> TCPDUMP: 1959818423 (1563119 packets)
> PROC:    5320731075
> 
> This is quite a big difference. From my tests, there isn't a fixed
> ratio between the two results and I see differences on all the servers
> I've tried it on (domU, dom0, no Xen, with bonding etc.)
> 
> With all this, the first question would be : Is there anything wrong
> with the script I'm using? If any network and/or python experts want to
> have a look...
> 
> If the answer to the above is "nothing", then something really
> wrong is going on...
> 
> Matthias
> 


-- 
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora release 10 (Cambridge) - Linux kernel
2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.x86_64 Load : 0.24 0.16 0.18

_______________________________________________
rhelv5-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list

Reply via email to