On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Paul Krizak wrote:
The list of fixes for the kernel is staggering. I don't know if that's good or bad! (good that the bugs are fixed, bad that they were there in the first place?)
Perhaps it would be helpful to read Red Hat's pieces on the phases of a lifecycle, and reflect on how that drives slipstreamed fixes and enhancements, vs. being constrained to pure security updates. Also, with a RHEL 6 in testing, engineering focus will tend to shift to the latest release, notwithstanding the Enterprise moniker.
-- Russ herrold _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
