Oh yeah, and the second number is the number of times ALL of the threads
have been in use.


Corey

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Corey Kovacs <corey.kov...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Well, I dind't miss, just didn't mention it. The big number is not the
> 1-10% of the threads being busy, it's how much time was spent waiting for a
> thread to free up to complete an I/O. You could interpret that as busy of
> course, but "why" it's busy is more important.
>
> Corey
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Joshua Baker-LePain <jl...@duke.edu>wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 at 6:59am, Corey Kovacs wrote
>>
>>  One thing that is fairly obvious if you know where to look, is that your
>>> server needs to have more threads running.
>>>
>>> The line...
>>>
>>>
>>> th 8 0 3828.727 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
>>>
>>> Indicates this. The "th" means "thread(s)" and the "8" is how many are
>>> running.
>>> The " 3828.727" is telling you a significant number of instances have
>>> occurred
>>> in which I/O was waiting for a thread in order to be serviced and this
>>> complete.
>>>
>>
>> Actually, I think you missed a field there.  As you said, "th" is threads,
>> and "8" is how many are running.  It's the *next* number, which is 0, which
>> is the number of times I/O has been waiting for a free thread. Following
>> that there are 10 fields.  The first (3828.727) is the amount of time 1-10%
>> of the threads have been busy.  The second is the amount of time 11-20% of
>> the threads have been busy.  Etc.  So the above actually shows a very
>> *non*-busy NFS server.  There have been no thread starved I/O events, and
>> never has more than 1 thread been busy.
>>
>> And, to the OP, iftop can be useful here, given that there aren't any
>> other significant sources of network traffic.
>>
>> --
>> Joshua Baker-LePain
>> QB3 Shared Cluster Sysadmin
>> UCSF
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> rhelv5-list mailing list
>> rhelv5-list@redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/**mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list<https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
rhelv5-list mailing list
rhelv5-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list

Reply via email to