On 10 December 2010 00:24, Collins, Kevin [BEELINE] <kcoll...@chevron.com>wrote:
> Yeah, I thought about that but then if an update comes out from RedHat
> with the same revision, I would likely not see that one (which I would
> want to see, so I can rebuild it to get any bug fixes).
>
>
If I want to make sure I get the new release from Red Hat (or anywhere else
for that matter) I change the release from (in this case) "2%{dist}" to
either "2.0.1%{dist}" or "2%{dist}.0.1". It's possible, but highly
unlikely, that Red Hat would release a new version that is the same as
either of those: they might go for "2.1%{dist}" or simply rebuild the same
version for RHEL7 (that'll get the google searchers wondering).
I've never come across a case where yum would use the build date or similar
to determine a package is newer: the underlying RPM stuff uses only the
epoch, release and version doesn't it?
jch
_______________________________________________
rhelv6-list mailing list
rhelv6-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-list
