George Orwell's 1984 Newspeak is alive and well in the current US 
administration.

" a checklist of the work the world will 
demand of this president and his subordinates in a second term."

really means

"a checklist of what we are going to do regardless of the risks to the world or 
what  anyone says"

Garth Cartledge

> 
> From: "prezbotchistheultimatechimpanzee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 16/11/2004 0:38:12
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [rhetoric-list] Neo-Con Agenda: Iran, China, Russia, Latin America 
> ...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> by Jim Lobe 
> IPS, 5 November  2004 
> www.globalresearch.ca 9 November 2004 
> The URL of this article is: 
> http://globalresearch.ca/articles/LOB411A.html 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> An influential foreign-policy neo-conservative with longstanding 
> ties to top hawks in the administration of President George W Bush 
> has laid out what he calls ''a checklist of the work the world will 
> demand of this president and his subordinates in a second term.''
> 
> The list, which begins with the destruction of Fallujah in Iraq and 
> ends with the development of ''appropriate strategies'' for dealing 
> with threats posed by China, Russia and ''the emergence of a number 
> of aggressively anti-American regimes in Latin America,'' also calls 
> for ''regime change'' in Iran and North Korea.
> 
> The list's author, Frank Gaffney, the founder and president of the 
> Centre for Security Policy (CSP), also warns that Bush should resist 
> any pressure arising from the anticipated demise of Palestinian 
> leader Yasser Arafat to resume peace talks that could result in 
> Israel's giving up ''defensible boundaries.''
> 
> While all seven steps listed by Gaffney in an article published 
> Friday morning in the 'National Review Online' have long been 
> favoured by prominent neo-cons, the article itself, 'Worldwide 
> Value', is the first comprehensive compilation to emerge since 
> Bush's re-election Tuesday.
> 
> It is also sure to be contested, not just by Democrats who, with the 
> election behind them, are poised to take a more anti-war position on 
> Iraq, but by many conservative Republicans in Congress. They blame 
> the neo-cons for failing to anticipate the quagmire in Iraq and 
> worry their grander ambitions, like those expounded by Gaffney, will 
> bankrupt the Treasury and break an already-overextended military.
> 
> Yet its importance as a road map of where neo-conservatives -- who, 
> with the critical help of Vice President Dick Cheney and Defence 
> Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, dominated Bush's foreign policy after the 
> Sep. 11, 2001 attacks on New York and the Pentagon -- want U.S. 
> policy to go, was underlined by Gaffney's listing of the names of 
> his friends in the administration who he said, ''helped the 
> president imprint moral values on American security policy in a way 
> and to an extent not seen since Ronald Reagan's first term.''
> 
> In addition to Cheney and Rumsfeld, he cited the most clearly 
> identified -- and controversial -- neo-conservatives serving in the 
> administration: Cheney's chief of staff, I Lewis ''Scooter'' Libby; 
> his top Middle East advisors, John Hannah and David Wurmser; weapons 
> proliferation specialist Robert Joseph and top Mideast aide Elliott 
> Abrams, on the National Security Council (NSC).
> 
> Also on the roster are: Deputy Defence Secretary Paul Wolfowitz; 
> Undersecretary for Policy Douglas Feith; Feith's top Mideast aide 
> William Luti, in the Pentagon; Undersecretary for Arms Control and 
> International Security John Bolton, and for global issues, Paula 
> Dobriansky at the State Department.
> 
> Virtually all of the same individuals have been cited by critics of 
> the Iraq War, including Democratic lawmakers and retired senior 
> foreign service and military officials, as responsible for hijacking 
> the policy and intelligence process that led to the U.S. invasion of 
> Iraq in March 2003.
> 
> Indeed, in a lengthy interview about the war on the most-watched 
> public-affairs TV programme, '60 Minutes', last May, the former head 
> of the U.S. Central Command and Secretary of State Colin Powell's 
> chief Middle East envoy until 2003, retired Gen Anthony Zinni, 
> called for the resignation of Libby, Abrams, Wolfowitz and Feith, as 
> well as Rumsfeld, for their roles in the attack.
> 
> Zinni also cited former Defence Policy Board (DPB) chairman, Richard 
> Perle, who has been close to Gaffney since both of them served, 
> along with Abrams, in the office of Washington State Senator Henry M 
> Jackson in the early 1970s.
> 
> When Perle became an assistant secretary of defence under Reagan he 
> brought Gaffney along as his deputy. When Perle left in 1987, 
> Gaffney succeeded him before setting up CSP in 1989.
> 
> As Perle's long-time protege and associate, Gaffney sits at the 
> centre of a network of interlocking think tanks, foundations, lobby 
> groups, arms manufacturers and individuals that constitute the 
> coalition of neo-conservatives, aggressive nationalists like Cheney 
> and Rumsfeld and Christian Right activists responsible for the 
> unilateralist trajectory of U.S. foreign policy since 9/11.
> 
> Included among CSP's board of advisers over the years have been 
> Rumsfeld, Perle, Feith, Christian moralist William Bennett, Abrams, 
> Feith, Joseph, former United Nations Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick, 
> former Navy Undersecretary John Lehman and former Central 
> Intelligence Agency (CIA) Director James Woolsey.
> 
> Woolsey also co-chairs the new Committee on the Present Danger 
> (CPD), another prominent neo-con-led lobby group that argues 
> Washington is now engaged in ''World War IV'' against ''Islamo-
> fascism.''
> 
> Also serving on its advisory council are executives from some of the 
> country's largest military contractors, which -- along with wealthy 
> individuals sympathetic to Israel's governing Likud Party, such as 
> prominent New York investor Lawrence Kadish and California casino 
> king Irving Moskowitz, and right-wing bodies, such as the Bradley, 
> Sarah Scaife and Olin Foundations -- finance CSP's work.
> 
> Gaffney, a ubiquitous ''talking head'' on TV in the run-up to the 
> war in Iraq, sits on the boards of CPD's parent organisations, the 
> Foundation for the Defence of Democracies (FDD) and Americans for 
> Victory Over Terrorism (AVOT). He was a charter associate, with 
> Cheney, Rumsfeld, Perle, Wolfowitz and Abrams, of the Project for 
> the New American Century (PNAC), another prominent neo-conservative-
> led group that offered up a similar checklist of what Bush should do 
> in the ''war on terrorism'' just nine days after the 9/11 attacks.
> 
> His article opens by trying to pre-empt an argument that is already 
> being heard on the right against expanding Bush's ''war on 
> terrorism'': that since a plurality of Bush voters 
> identified ''moral values'' as their chief concern, the president 
> should stick to his social conservative agenda rather than expand 
> the war.
> 
> ''The reality is that the same moral principles that underpinned the 
> Bush appeal on 'values' issues like gay marriage, stem-cell research 
> and the right to life were central to his vision of U.S. war aims 
> and foreign policy,'' according to Gaffney.
> 
> ''Indeed, the president laid claim squarely to the ultimate moral 
> value -- freedom -- as the cornerstone of his strategy for defeating 
> our Islamofascist enemies and their state sponsors, for whom that 
> concept is utterly (sic) anathema.''
> 
> To be true to that commitment, policy in the second administration 
> must be directed toward seven priorities, according to Gaffney, 
> beginning with the ''reduction in detail of Fallujah and other safe 
> havens utilised by freedom's enemies in Iraq''; followed by ''regime 
> change -- one way or another -- in Iran and North Korea, the only 
> hope for preventing these remaining 'Axis of Evil' states from fully 
> realising their terrorist and nuclear ambitions.''
> 
> Third, the administration must provide ''the substantially increased 
> resources needed to re-equip a transforming military and rebuild 
> human-intelligence capabilities (minus, if at all possible, the 
> sorts of intelligence 'reforms' contemplated pre-election that would 
> make matters worse on this and other scores) while we fight World 
> War IV, followed by enhancing ''protection of our homeland, 
> including deploying effective missile defences at sea and in space, 
> as well as ashore."
> 
> Fifth, Washington must keep ''faith with Israel, whose destruction 
> remains a priority for the same people who want to destroy us 
> (and ... for our shared 'moral values) especially in the face of 
> Yasser Arafat's demise and the inevitable, post-election pressure 
> to 'solve' the Middle East problem by forcing the Israelis to 
> abandon defensible boundaries.''
> 
> Sixth, the administration must deal with France and Germany and the 
> dynamic that made them ''so problematic in the first term: namely, 
> their willingness to make common cause with our enemies for profit 
> and their desire to employ a united Europe and its new constitution -
> - as well as other international institutions and mechanisms -- to 
> thwart the expansion and application of American power where deemed 
> necessary by Washington.''
> 
> Finally, writes Gaffney, Bush must adapt ''appropriate strategies 
> for contending with China's increasingly fascistic trade and 
> military policies, (Russian President) Vladimir Putin's accelerating 
> authoritarianism at home and aggressiveness toward the former Soviet 
> republics, the worldwide spread of Islamofascism, and the emergence 
> of a number of aggressively anti-American regimes in Latin 
> America'', which he does not identify.
> 
> ''These items do not represent some sort of neo-con 'imperialist' 
> game plan'', Gaffney stressed. ''Rather, they constitute a checklist 
> of the work the world will demand of this president and his 
> subordinates in a second term.'' 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> The Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at 
> www.globalresearch.ca grants permission to cross-post original 
> Global Research (Canada) articles in their entirety, or any portions 
> thereof, on community internet sites, as long as the text & title of 
> the article are not modified. The source must be acknowledged as 
> follows: Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at 
> www.globalresearch.ca .  For cross-postings, kindly use the active 
> URL hyperlink address of the original CRG article. The author's 
> copyright note must be displayed. (For articles from other news 
> sources, check with the original copyright holder, where 
> applicable.). For publication of Global Research (Canada) articles 
> in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, 
> contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>      -----
>     / o o \
> ===OO=====OO=============================================
> (4)Portals (2)News Wikis (2)Conferences - No BuSHIT!
> Start here: http://pnews.org/ (On Internet since 1982)
> http://pnews.org/PhpWiki/ (West Coast News Wiki)
> http://g0lem.net/PhpWiki/ (East Coast News Wiki)
> =========================================================
>  FIGHT THE RIGHT!
> ==================
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 

This message was sent through MyMail http://www.mymail.com.au




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/XgSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

     -----
    / o o \
===OO=====OO=============================================
(4)Portals (2)News Wikis (2)Conferences - No BuSHIT!
Start here: http://pnews.org/ (On Internet since 1982)
http://pnews.org/PhpWiki/ (West Coast News Wiki)
http://g0lem.net/PhpWiki/ (East Coast News Wiki)
=========================================================
 FIGHT THE RIGHT!
==================
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rhetoric-list/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to