|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ANNOUNCEMENTS and ARTICLES: http://pnews.org/art/art.shtml ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
On7/1/04 9:03 AM, ALPHA spake thusly: > |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| > ANNOUNCEMENTS and ARTICLES: http://pnews.org/art/art.shtml > |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| > > From: Harvey Rosetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > received from Louis Proyect > > The reason for this is obvious. Kerry is for the war in Iraq. If he > wanted to become more popular, he should oppose the war. We are watching > a rerun of the 1968 elections with the pro-war Humphrey running against > the pro-war Nixon who lied that he had a secret plan to end the war. > Kerry doesn't even measure up to Nixon. Not only doesn't he have a > "secret plan", he pledges to "stay the course" and not "cut and run" > because that would produce a domino effect (he doesn't use those words, > but clearly this is what he means.) When crowds at Yankee Stadium boo > the vice-president, we are talking about a new situation. In the > aftermath of 9/11 such sporting events were virtually pro-war rallies. > Kerry would rather lose the election than promise something that the > bourgeoisie is opposed to in a significant fashion. Such is the reality > of American "democracy". > > > -- Very smart of the Rove crowd to paint Kerry as a changeable, indecisive type, because it curtails Kerry's options now. I agree that his doing the right thing would be a boost to his visibility and popularity.... Rowland --- / o o \ ===OO=====OO================================================= http://pnews.org/vortal/ New World disOrder and Myth Busters http://g0lem.net/vortal/ Insane Planet and Wacko World http://g0lem.net/portal/ Bad-Ass Truth and TheGolemsPortal http://pnews.org/portal/ Naked Truth and PNEWS Portal http://g0lem.net/PhpWiki/ (Wiki) http://pnews.org/ (Home) -DON'T FEED THE TROLLS- ============================================================= \_/ \_/
