Here is what I have so far, which gives me "This action is invalid
when the mock object is in replay state" which seems to make sense
since I am trying to setup expectation while in the replay state.
Advice?

MockRepository.cs

        internal object MethodCall(IInvocation invocation, object
proxy, MethodInfo method, object[] args)
        {
....
            return MethodCallWithDefault(state, invocation, proxy,
method, args);
        }


        private object MethodCallWithDefault(IMockState state,
IInvocation invocation, object proxy, MethodInfo method, object[]
args)
        {
            object returnObject = state.MethodCall(invocation, method,
args);

            //if returned object is null and it is a property for an
interface, auto mock it
            if (
                returnObject == null &&
                AllowNewObjectForNullInterfaces &&
                method.ReturnType != null &&
                method.ReturnType.IsInterface &&
                method.IsSpecialName &&
                method.Name.StartsWith("get_")
            )
            {
                //create new stub for return object
                returnObject = this.Stub(method.ReturnType);

                //setup up mock result for new instance
                state.LastMethodOptions.Return(returnObject);
            }

            return returnObject;
        }



On Oct 8, 8:39 pm, webpaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just so we are clear, you expect
> Expect.Call(mockService.Identity.Interface1.Interface2.Interface3.Name).Ret­urn("foo")
> to work as well, right?
>
> Also, every time I get source from the rhino trunk I have to go in and
> add the missing assemblyinfo.cs files to all the projects to get it to
> compile. Any good reason for that?
>
> On Oct 8, 1:54 am, "Ayende Rahien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > No, you don't need to touch dynamic proxy.The behavior can be controlled
> > from RecordMockState. Take a look at RhinoIntercepor, as an example of how
> > we manage things.
> > This is basically making rhino mocks return a mock for an interface method
> > cal.
>
> > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 6:32 AM, webpaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Regarding
> > >http://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2008/10/08/rhino-mocks-challenge-imple...
> > > :
>
> > > Do you expect that Identity is not null in this test and should have
> > > an implementation? If so, I'm curious whether you expect changes to
> > > Castle.DynamicProxy.ProxyGenerator or not. In the below test
> > > mockService.Identity is null and gives an exception as such. Do you
> > > expect that and want that fixed or am I missing something?
>
> > >    public interface ISomeInterface
> > >    {
> > >        string Name { get; set; }
> > >    }
>
> > >    public interface IMyService
> > >    {
> > >        ISomeInterface Identity { get; set;}
> > >    }
>
> > >    [TestFixture]
> > >        public class FluentMocksTests
> > >        {
> > >                [Test]
> > >                public void CanCallSomeRandomInterfaceProperty()
> > >                {
> > >            var mockService =
> > > MockRepository.GenerateMock<IMyService>();
> > >            Expect.Call(mockService.Identity.Name).Return("foo");
> > >            Assert.AreEqual("foo", mockService.Identity.Name);
> > >                }
> > >        }- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Rhino Tools Dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to