I'm confused. If I were following the example to which I linked, it
seems like I would have to replace this
Report rpt = Repository<Report>.Get(int.Parse(Request.Form["ID"]));
with this
IRepository<Report> ReportRepository { get; set; }
...
Report rpt = ReportRepository.Get(int.Parse(Request.Form["ID"]));
and ensure this is set every time the controller is instantiated?
That doesn't seem right to me, since I am happily able to use the
first syntax example in a web environment.
Thanks for your additional thoughts.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Ken Egozi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you can use Property Injection instead of Constructor Injection.
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Chris Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Is there an alternative to the constructor arguments that need to be
>> passed into a controller to initialize the repositories for testing?
>> I thought removing this labor was the point of Inversion of Control?
>>
>>
>> http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&q=show:cPgO18fR3ls:HSLBCsEYdUs:cPgO18fR3ls&sa=N&ct=rd&cs_p=http://sutekishop.googlecode.com/svn&cs_f=trunk/Suteki.Shop/Suteki.Shop.Tests/Controllers/BasketControllerTests.cs
>>
>> Thanks for your thoughts.
>>
>> --
>> "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
>> Martin Luther King, Jr.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ken Egozi.
> http://www.kenegozi.com/blog
> http://www.musicglue.com
> http://www.castleproject.org
> http://www.gotfriends.co.il
>
> >
>
--
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
Martin Luther King, Jr.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Rhino Tools Dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
