That makes sense.
I think we do want to have a common repository, but perhaps with a much
simplified interface.

I find myself using FindAll and FindOne with DetachedCriteria a lot.  I also
use Get and of course Save a lot.  Other than that, I don't use much of it.
 Do others have the same experience?

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Ayende Rahien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It isn't. But a lot of people are using it, and I am going to do my best to
> avoid breaking backcomp at a whim.
> Breaking it to its own project means that we are free not to think about it
> and have a fresh new start.
>
> Mostly, though, I am not sure if we even want to have a common repository.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Nathan Stott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Currently in my projects, I've been making my own IRepository that has
>> many less methods and then implementing my IRepository with Rhinos.
>> I am definitely in favor of anything that simplifies the Rhino IRepository
>> interface.
>>
>> I don't understand how moving IRepository<T> to its own project is going
>> to simplify the interface, though.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Ayende Rahien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>
>>> For a long time, IRepository<T> has been bothering me.In particular, we
>>> have literally scores of methods there, and the interface is way too big and
>>> complex.
>>>
>>> My current action is to move the IRepository<T> and associates to their
>>> own project, thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Rhino Tools Dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to