Nice solution! Can you show / explain how you're using the field level security in your application?
Thanks Marco On Dec 22, 10:57 pm, "Bart Reyserhove" <[email protected]> wrote: > It > works:http://bartreyserhove.blogspot.com/2008/12/using-nhibernate-mapping-o... > Thanks, > > Bart > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > > You should be able to do that, yes. > > The idea is that you are simply changing the mapping. I think that the > > easiest thing would be to do so statically, just by adding BartOp.hbm.xml > > and selectively getting the mapping for all the other entities. > > > That would be a great topic for a blog post, by the way > > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Bart Reyserhove < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> Good point! If I'm not mistaking I can do that without the need to change > >> anything in the Rhino.Security code right? > > >> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> Hm, I get a queasy feeling in my stomach for that. Remind me of Win32 > >>> Why not? > > >>> public class BartOperation : Operation > >>> { > >>> OperationType OperationIsStronglyTyped {get;set;} > > >>> } > > >>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Bart Reyserhove < > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> An integer so that I can use an enumeration with the different types of > >>>> Operations I need. > > >>>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>wrote: > > >>>>> What would you want that type to contain? > > >>>>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Bart Reyserhove < > >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>> I'd like to make a distinction between different types of operations. > >>>>>> I have operations that are really operations such as for example > >>>>>> "Login" but > >>>>>> I have also operations for field level access, for example > >>>>>> "User/UserName". > >>>>>> I would like to make a disctinction between those two. There is a > >>>>>> "comment" > >>>>>> field in the "Operations" table, but it does not seem right to (mis)use > >>>>>> that. > > >>>>>> Would you accept a patch that adds a "Type" field to the "Operations" > >>>>>> table or do you have another suggestion? > > >>>>>> Bart --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
