I'm using ASP.NET MVC and we created some extensions methods for the HtmlHelper so that we have instead of Html.TextBox(...) an Html.SecuredTextBox. I am preparing a blog post on this topic. Should be ready pretty soon. Bart
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Marco <[email protected]> wrote: > > Nice solution! > > Can you show / explain how you're using the field level security in > your application? > > Thanks > Marco > > On Dec 22, 10:57 pm, "Bart Reyserhove" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > It works: > http://bartreyserhove.blogspot.com/2008/12/using-nhibernate-mapping-o... > > Thanks, > > > > Bart > > > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > You should be able to do that, yes. > > > The idea is that you are simply changing the mapping. I think that the > > > easiest thing would be to do so statically, just by adding > BartOp.hbm.xml > > > and selectively getting the mapping for all the other entities. > > > > > That would be a great topic for a blog post, by the way > > > > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Bart Reyserhove < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> Good point! If I'm not mistaking I can do that without the need to > change > > >> anything in the Rhino.Security code right? > > > > >> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > >>> Hm, I get a queasy feeling in my stomach for that. Remind me of Win32 > > >>> Why not? > > > > >>> public class BartOperation : Operation > > >>> { > > >>> OperationType OperationIsStronglyTyped {get;set;} > > > > >>> } > > > > >>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Bart Reyserhove < > > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>> An integer so that I can use an enumeration with the different types > of > > >>>> Operations I need. > > > > >>>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > >>>>> What would you want that type to contain? > > > > >>>>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Bart Reyserhove < > > >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> Hi all, > > >>>>>> I'd like to make a distinction between different types of > operations. > > >>>>>> I have operations that are really operations such as for example > "Login" but > > >>>>>> I have also operations for field level access, for example > "User/UserName". > > >>>>>> I would like to make a disctinction between those two. There is a > "comment" > > >>>>>> field in the "Operations" table, but it does not seem right to > (mis)use > > >>>>>> that. > > > > >>>>>> Would you accept a patch that adds a "Type" field to the > "Operations" > > >>>>>> table or do you have another suggestion? > > > > >>>>>> Bart > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
