No, you can just use >> with the source that you have, because this is a builtin operator For words, you would need the patch. You can see an example of using >> in Rhino ETL
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Paul Cowan <[email protected]> wrote: > Great! > > Do I need to download the patch? > > Is there an example of using ">>" anywhere? > > Perhaps in the Rhino source? > > 2009/1/3 Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> > > That would require macro operators, which are currently not part of boo. >> There is a patch for this that I made a while ago, though. >> >> What you can do is: >> >> depend: >> log4net >> "lib" >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 11:28 AM, dagda1 <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am extending an existing DSL for the open source project I am >>> working on code named horn (http://the-software-simpleton.blogspot.com/ >>> 2008/12/horn-package-management-project.html<http://the-software-simpleton.blogspot.com/2008/12/horn-package-management-project.html> >>> ). >>> >>> Anyway I am trying to define dependencies as part of the existing boo >>> DSL and I want the following syntax to tell me which dependency to >>> include and where it should be copied too when it has been compiled. >>> >>> I am trying to get the following syntax but I do not believe this is >>> possible: >>> >>> depend: >>> Log4net copy_to "lib" >>> >>> I know the following is possible: >>> >>> depend: >>> Include log4net, "lib" >>> >>> I really do not like the second syntax and can anyone help me getter a >>> more descriptive syntax? >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Paul >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
